<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s (Virtually) Painless Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/</link>
	<description>The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research and analysis on the web-based communications industry. TBR content is posted, created and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:15:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harald Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>Harald Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>Good to hear that someone managed to get the form accept the serial numbers and get an exchange battery. I didn&#039;t, although the battery is clearly within the listed range. The web based exchange process declares both the computer (6 months old) and the battery as not eligible. A quick search reveals that there are tons of people across the globe with this problem, and Apple apparently does nothing to remedy the situation. You can&#039;t even talk to a Support rep about the issue or order the replacement by phone. It&#039;s web only.
So let&#039;s recap: I have a PowerBook at home which I bought to have a portable computer, but I&#039;m not allowed to use the old battery anymore, which means I can only use the PB stationary. Neither can I get a new battery as the web form plays up and rejects my valid serial numbers. Very badly dissapointed by a company whose products I have been using for 16 years! Class action anyone? I&#039;ll join!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that someone managed to get the form accept the serial numbers and get an exchange battery. I didn&#8217;t, although the battery is clearly within the listed range. The web based exchange process declares both the computer (6 months old) and the battery as not eligible. A quick search reveals that there are tons of people across the globe with this problem, and Apple apparently does nothing to remedy the situation. You can&#8217;t even talk to a Support rep about the issue or order the replacement by phone. It&#8217;s web only.<br />
So let&#8217;s recap: I have a PowerBook at home which I bought to have a portable computer, but I&#8217;m not allowed to use the old battery anymore, which means I can only use the PB stationary. Neither can I get a new battery as the web form plays up and rejects my valid serial numbers. Very badly dissapointed by a company whose products I have been using for 16 years! Class action anyone? I&#8217;ll join!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Lystrup</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Lystrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>I went a different route and recalled my mac book, meaning I just got a refund rather than bother with something that didn&#039;t work at all -- batteries aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went a different route and recalled my mac book, meaning I just got a refund rather than bother with something that didn&#8217;t work at all &#8212; batteries aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Bottary</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Bottary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/apples-virtually-painless-recall/#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>I applaud the use of of exchange versus recall, but more than that, I like that somebody gave it some extra thought in a way most people do not.&#160;&#160; Rather than get caught up in the mechanics of the recall, someone had the presence of mind to refine the moment for its customers.&#160; It&#039;s similar to what Delta Airlines did with Song.&#160; It didn&#039;t shut down the airline, it simply brought it home into the Delta brand, and according to the company, brought Song&#039;s routes and most valuable cultural assets to the mother ship.&#160; Nicely done.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud the use of of exchange versus recall, but more than that, I like that somebody gave it some extra thought in a way most people do not.&nbsp;&nbsp; Rather than get caught up in the mechanics of the recall, someone had the presence of mind to refine the moment for its customers.&nbsp; It&#8217;s similar to what Delta Airlines did with Song.&nbsp; It didn&#8217;t shut down the airline, it simply brought it home into the Delta brand, and according to the company, brought Song&#8217;s routes and most valuable cultural assets to the mother ship.&nbsp; Nicely done.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
