Strumpette vs. PR Bloggers April 19, 2006

Posted by Rita Desai in Blogs, PR, Web 2.0

A strange persona entered and shook up the PR world (at least the part that is online and blogging) rather recently. Strumpette, a blog written by one Amanda Chapel, has inspired a great deal of vitriol from online PR folks such as Steve Rubel, fellow Edel-ite Phil Gomes, the young and ambitious Flackette and even Shel Holtz. A strange site to see, as most PR bloggers are rarely critical of the industry and are genuinely giddy about the power of blogging. But when faced with Strumpette in March, they quickly switched into an attack mode.

The overall response to this particular blog is 180 degrees from what was received by the blogger formerly known as Anonymous Lawyer. Anonymous Lawyer turned out to be a 3L at Harvard Law School with a gift for writing well enough for people to wish he were real.

Amanda Chapel,a.k.a Strumpette, on the other hand, receives constant criticism from industry heads such as Media Orchard’s Scott Baradell who wrote that Strumpette was “pompous and condescending”, “dishonest” and “purposely hurtful to others”because she doesn’t respect the public relations industry enough. (Ironically, the most popular and entertaining blogs necessarily fit the qualities Baradell uses to describe Strumpette. I, for one, am a Denton-media addict and could not do without my daily cup of cynicism.)

Strumpette is frequently critical of the public relations industry. Posts typically point to the problems the industry regularly faces, such as overbilling and controversial clientele or programs. Chapel is also a bit snarky and irreverent (in the classic blogger way), and also creates some mischief that, while mean-spirited, is nothing new in the practice of blogging. In fact, Edelman’s Rick Murray and Steve Rubel were initially so alarmed by Strumpette, that they posted (very long) comments to Chapel’s blog, attempting to turn their critical foe into a more neutral friend.(Steve Rubel should have been flattered; being made fun of by Strumpette means you’ve really made it.) When that didn’t work, the Edel-bloggers tried to fight fire with fire, which was even stranger, since Amanda says in her blog that she is “just a character”, although her character is reminiscent of the one portrayed by Heather Locklear on Melrose Place (her bio bluntly boasts of a promiscuous nature which she sometimes taps into when bantering or shocking commenters and readers). Whether it is actually true or not is irrelevant to the criticism she posts: Amanda is a character, an anonymous one, who has fun with her readers at the expense of the public relations industry. It just seemed that most PR bloggers could not handle the occassional slam that most white collar professions (including banking, law and medicine) receive.

Strumpette’s readers are a mixed bag. She tends to make some of them laugh and others, those who are incredibly angry, can’t seem to stop themselves from reading her blog or commenting. The anger, interestingly enough, seems to stem from how she illustrates her career to date; she claims that her bawdy escapades with clients (which she never really describes) are responsible for advancing her career. (You can imagine how an industry dominated by a mostly female workforce would feel after reading that.)

I imagine most readers (and even Strumpette herself) aren’t certain what to make of Edelman’s online counselors handling of the blog. They attempted to unmask the blogger (to no avail, though even unmasking her does not hide the fact that from her writing, it is evident that she has worked/does work in the industry.) Other PR bloggers have joined Rubel, Murray and Gomes in order to try to discredit her. Yet the purpose of going after Strumpette remains completely unclear.

The PR industry has faced its fair share of criticism. Furthermore, it’s unlikely that Strumpette, an anonymous character, will take down the entire industry or call any major bluffs that PR people haven’t already faced. Or maybe he/she/it will. Either way, it’s made Strumpette extremely popular on the web. Maybe Strumpette is proof that any kind of publicity works wonders, especially online.

Share

Trackbacks/Pings

Comments

  1. Vote -1 Vote +1Peter Himler - April 19th, 2006 at 11:40 am

    The source of The Strumpette’s problems have less to do with her criticism of the industry or supposed loose ways, and much more to do with the nature of her true identity.

  2. Vote -1 Vote +1Rita Desai - April 19th, 2006 at 12:08 pm

    Hi Peter,

    I don’t understand why the nature of her true identity really matters at all. Also, her bio offended an Edelman employee by the name of Kate, whose comment on one of Strumpette’s posts referred to her supposed lascivious escapades. Phil Gomes also refers to her “loose ways” when commenting. Her bio, which I took as a joke, is used against her. She says she’s a character, so why does her true identity even matter?

    Just strikes me as a really bizarre situation.

    Thanks,
    Rita

  3. Vote -1 Vote +1Amanda Chapel - April 19th, 2006 at 1:35 pm

    Rita,

    Word is that a few of the PR blogger gang mugged Minnie Mouse at Disney World a few days ago. Turns out she’s just some poor housewife from Orlando. She should be out of the hospital in a few weeks. The PR bloggers are less threatened, at least for the time being.

    Anyway, I wrote the following on PBS.org’s Mediashift the other day. It bears repeating: I remember my close friend Marcy once hired the Bloomingdale’s Santa to come to her house and surprise her young kids. When he showed up, they cried; they screamed! They were absolutely terrified. Anyway, that Santa was still paid for the visit; and still there was a huge line the next day of other kids that wanted to meet him.

    Although perversely flattering, the debate of identity misses the point altogether. However noisy, it is motivated by a few literal minds and blog pilgrim fundamentalists. That’s too bad.

    Strumpette is representative of the PR business. It’s a satire whose mission it is to pick at the root hypocrisy that grips that business. Some get it. Some rail against it. A whole lot are reading every word.

    Thank you for your commentary.

    Kind regards,

    - Amanda Chapel
    Editor
    Strumpette.com

  4. Vote -1 Vote +1Shel Holtz - April 19th, 2006 at 6:22 pm

    Online credibility is based on transparancy. Strumpette has none (of either). That’s why identity matters. The anonymous blog of a New York City bouncer is one thing; nobody is going to make career or professional decisions based on what he writes. A purported PR blogger is another thing altogether, as would be one from a lawyer, an engineer, or a doctor. Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.

  5. Vote -1 Vote +1Todd Zeigler - April 19th, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    I don’t thing Strumpette strives for credibility. He/she is trying to make mischief. Seems off point to criticize Strumpette for not being transparent when his/her sole purpose is to cause trouble.  Or to expose hypocricy, as Amanda put it.

  6. Vote -1 Vote +1Amanda Chapel - April 19th, 2006 at 7:53 pm

    Rita – I wrote a thoughtful response to this thread. Why was it taken down?

    Shel – “Online credibility is based on transparency.” Says who? And who are you Shel to be so dogmatic on an open frontier?

    “Blogging is about candor and authenticity.” That’s pure donkey dust. Blogging is about writing. And frankly, I’ll compare notes with you as to writing skill any day of the week.

    Todd – “Trouble”… I hope you were not being pejorative. A little creative turbulence is a good thing. In the PR business, it’s long overdue.

    Kind regards,

    - Amanda

  7. Vote -1 Vote +1Todd Zeigler - April 19th, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    Amanda,

    Your original comment was stuck in moderation – Wordpress is trying to shut you up too.  The comment is now approved and viewable by all.
    Oh, and trouble = good.

    TZ

  8. Vote -1 Vote +1Damien Del Porto - April 20th, 2006 at 1:26 am

    Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.

    I can´t say I see why candor and authenticity and necessities for good blogs, especially if satire and commentary is the point (which is what the vast majority of the blogosphere concerns itself with). I think Thomas Paine would agree.

  9. Vote -1 Vote +1scott - April 23rd, 2006 at 9:28 am

    Todd,

    If you read Media Orchard, you know that I am not opposed to criticism of the public relations industry. In fact, I often delight in it.

    Personally, I just think the guy who claims to be Amanda Chapel is a jackass. And so I have written as much on my blog. If you do not think this man is a jackass, read away and enjoy.

    Cheers

    Scott

  10. Vote -1 Vote +1Gregory Kohs - April 23rd, 2006 at 2:10 pm

    I don’t care about the “fictional character” aspect. I don’t care about the “trouble for the PR world” aspect.

    What I care about is the hypocrisy.

    Amanda posted a comment here, asking why her (albeit technically delayed) “thoughtful response” was taken down. When my “thoughtful response” to one of her early blog posts was not approved, she told me (in as many words) to “shove it”.

    Then, miss Minnie Mouse character at Disney proceeded to tie up my e-mail inbox for two straight days, threatening legal action against my employer. Why? Because I was “harassing” a FICTIONAL character? I didn’t know they had standing in a court of law.

    Please don’t misinterpret me. I like the *IDEA* behind Strumpette.com. What I don’t like is the execution of the content, in that there is hypocrisy and threat lying in wait, whenever the tide turns personally against “Amanda”.

    And, by the way, check out the traffic stats for Strumpette.com on Alexa.com. Run a regression line through that data, and it doesn’t look promising for Brian Connolly. Sorry! Amanda Chapel.

  11. Vote -1 Vote +1Amanda Chapel - May 1st, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    Scott Baradell and Gregory Kohs are two of my most avid (rabid) fanatics. It threatens them and they just can’t get past it.

    They are a good a case of net anonymity if there ever was one.

    Regards,

    - Amanda Chapel

About this blog

The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research, analysis and conversation on web-based communications and its increasingly powerful role in the economy, politics and society. TBR content is created, posted and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.



Email Subscription

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search Site


Archives


Most Popular


Authors


Tags