<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strumpette vs. PR Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>Scott Baradell and Gregory Kohs are two of my most avid (rabid) fanatics.  It threatens them and they just can&#039;t get past it.

They are a good a case of net anonymity if there ever was one.

Regards,

- Amanda Chapel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Baradell and Gregory Kohs are two of my most avid (rabid) fanatics.  It threatens them and they just can&#8217;t get past it.</p>
<p>They are a good a case of net anonymity if there ever was one.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>- Amanda Chapel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312626</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-312626</guid>
		<description>Scott Baradell and Gregory Kohs are two of my most avid (rabid) fanatics.  It threatens them and they just can&#039;t get past it.

They are a good a case of net anonymity if there ever was one.

Regards,

- Amanda Chapel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Baradell and Gregory Kohs are two of my most avid (rabid) fanatics.  It threatens them and they just can&#8217;t get past it.</p>
<p>They are a good a case of net anonymity if there ever was one.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>- Amanda Chapel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kohs</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about the &quot;fictional character&quot; aspect.  I don&#039;t care about the &quot;trouble for the PR world&quot; aspect.

What I care about is the hypocrisy.

Amanda posted a comment here, asking why her (albeit technically delayed) &quot;thoughtful response&quot; was taken down.  When my &quot;thoughtful response&quot; to one of her early blog posts was not approved, she told me (in as many words) to &quot;shove it&quot;.

Then, miss Minnie Mouse character at Disney proceeded to tie up my e-mail inbox for two straight days, threatening legal action against my employer.  Why?  Because I was &quot;harassing&quot; a FICTIONAL character?  I didn&#039;t know they had standing in a court of law.

Please don&#039;t misinterpret me.  I like the *IDEA* behind Strumpette.com.  What I don&#039;t like is the execution of the content, in that there is hypocrisy and threat lying in wait, whenever the tide turns personally against &quot;Amanda&quot;.

And, by the way, check out the traffic stats for Strumpette.com on Alexa.com.  Run a regression line through that data, and it doesn&#039;t look promising for Brian Connolly.  Sorry!  Amanda Chapel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about the &#8220;fictional character&#8221; aspect.  I don&#8217;t care about the &#8220;trouble for the PR world&#8221; aspect.</p>
<p>What I care about is the hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Amanda posted a comment here, asking why her (albeit technically delayed) &#8220;thoughtful response&#8221; was taken down.  When my &#8220;thoughtful response&#8221; to one of her early blog posts was not approved, she told me (in as many words) to &#8220;shove it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then, miss Minnie Mouse character at Disney proceeded to tie up my e-mail inbox for two straight days, threatening legal action against my employer.  Why?  Because I was &#8220;harassing&#8221; a FICTIONAL character?  I didn&#8217;t know they had standing in a court of law.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t misinterpret me.  I like the *IDEA* behind Strumpette.com.  What I don&#8217;t like is the execution of the content, in that there is hypocrisy and threat lying in wait, whenever the tide turns personally against &#8220;Amanda&#8221;.</p>
<p>And, by the way, check out the traffic stats for Strumpette.com on Alexa.com.  Run a regression line through that data, and it doesn&#8217;t look promising for Brian Connolly.  Sorry!  Amanda Chapel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kohs</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312625</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-312625</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about the &quot;fictional character&quot; aspect.  I don&#039;t care about the &quot;trouble for the PR world&quot; aspect.

What I care about is the hypocrisy.

Amanda posted a comment here, asking why her (albeit technically delayed) &quot;thoughtful response&quot; was taken down.  When my &quot;thoughtful response&quot; to one of her early blog posts was not approved, she told me (in as many words) to &quot;shove it&quot;.

Then, miss Minnie Mouse character at Disney proceeded to tie up my e-mail inbox for two straight days, threatening legal action against my employer.  Why?  Because I was &quot;harassing&quot; a FICTIONAL character?  I didn&#039;t know they had standing in a court of law.

Please don&#039;t misinterpret me.  I like the *IDEA* behind Strumpette.com.  What I don&#039;t like is the execution of the content, in that there is hypocrisy and threat lying in wait, whenever the tide turns personally against &quot;Amanda&quot;.

And, by the way, check out the traffic stats for Strumpette.com on Alexa.com.  Run a regression line through that data, and it doesn&#039;t look promising for Brian Connolly.  Sorry!  Amanda Chapel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about the &#8220;fictional character&#8221; aspect.  I don&#8217;t care about the &#8220;trouble for the PR world&#8221; aspect.</p>
<p>What I care about is the hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Amanda posted a comment here, asking why her (albeit technically delayed) &#8220;thoughtful response&#8221; was taken down.  When my &#8220;thoughtful response&#8221; to one of her early blog posts was not approved, she told me (in as many words) to &#8220;shove it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then, miss Minnie Mouse character at Disney proceeded to tie up my e-mail inbox for two straight days, threatening legal action against my employer.  Why?  Because I was &#8220;harassing&#8221; a FICTIONAL character?  I didn&#8217;t know they had standing in a court of law.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t misinterpret me.  I like the *IDEA* behind Strumpette.com.  What I don&#8217;t like is the execution of the content, in that there is hypocrisy and threat lying in wait, whenever the tide turns personally against &#8220;Amanda&#8221;.</p>
<p>And, by the way, check out the traffic stats for Strumpette.com on Alexa.com.  Run a regression line through that data, and it doesn&#8217;t look promising for Brian Connolly.  Sorry!  Amanda Chapel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>Todd,

If you read Media Orchard, you know that I am not opposed to criticism of the public relations industry. In fact, I often delight in it.

Personally, I just think the guy who claims to be Amanda Chapel is a jackass.  And so I have written as much on my blog. If you do not think this man is a jackass, read away and enjoy.

Cheers

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>If you read Media Orchard, you know that I am not opposed to criticism of the public relations industry. In fact, I often delight in it.</p>
<p>Personally, I just think the guy who claims to be Amanda Chapel is a jackass.  And so I have written as much on my blog. If you do not think this man is a jackass, read away and enjoy.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312624</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-312624</guid>
		<description>Todd,

If you read Media Orchard, you know that I am not opposed to criticism of the public relations industry. In fact, I often delight in it.

Personally, I just think the guy who claims to be Amanda Chapel is a jackass.  And so I have written as much on my blog. If you do not think this man is a jackass, read away and enjoy.

Cheers

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>If you read Media Orchard, you know that I am not opposed to criticism of the public relations industry. In fact, I often delight in it.</p>
<p>Personally, I just think the guy who claims to be Amanda Chapel is a jackass.  And so I have written as much on my blog. If you do not think this man is a jackass, read away and enjoy.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Del Porto</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Del Porto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 06:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.

I can´t say I see why candor and authenticity and necessities for good blogs, especially if satire and commentary is the point (which is what the vast majority of the blogosphere concerns itself with).  I think Thomas Paine would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.</p>
<p>I can´t say I see why candor and authenticity and necessities for good blogs, especially if satire and commentary is the point (which is what the vast majority of the blogosphere concerns itself with).  I think Thomas Paine would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Del Porto</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312623</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Del Porto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-312623</guid>
		<description>Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.

I can´t say I see why candor and authenticity and necessities for good blogs, especially if satire and commentary is the point (which is what the vast majority of the blogosphere concerns itself with).  I think Thomas Paine would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging is about candor and authenticity. You can’t claim these virtues if you won’t identify yourself.</p>
<p>I can´t say I see why candor and authenticity and necessities for good blogs, especially if satire and commentary is the point (which is what the vast majority of the blogosphere concerns itself with).  I think Thomas Paine would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Amanda,

Your original comment was stuck in moderation - Wordpress is trying to shut you up too.  The comment is now approved and viewable by all.
Oh, and trouble = good.

TZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda,</p>
<p>Your original comment was stuck in moderation &#8211; WordPress is trying to shut you up too.  The comment is now approved and viewable by all.<br />
Oh, and trouble = good.</p>
<p>TZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-312622</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/the-pr-blogger-that-wasnt/#comment-312622</guid>
		<description>Amanda,

Your original comment was stuck in moderation - Wordpress is trying to shut you up too.  The comment is now approved and viewable by all.
Oh, and trouble = good.

TZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda,</p>
<p>Your original comment was stuck in moderation &#8211; WordPress is trying to shut you up too.  The comment is now approved and viewable by all.<br />
Oh, and trouble = good.</p>
<p>TZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

