Wal-mart Blogger Relations - More Public Affairs than PR March 11, 2006

Posted by Todd Zeigler in Blogs, PR, Public Affairs

When I first read about Wal-Mart’s blogger relations campaign in the NYT, I immediately assumed that the goal of the campaign was to improve Wal-Mart’s overall corporate image. Change the perception of Wal-Mart in the blogosphere and ultimately win the general public’s hearts and minds. That assumption led me to think the whole campaign just seemed off. Wal-Mart should have their own blog (or blogs), and perhaps launch an internal evangelist program. Engage in a conversation with their customers. A Wal-Mart version of Microsoft’s Channel 9. That would be an interesting program and I believe it is something worth pursuing.

But that’s not what Wal-Mart was up to. In terms of the online component, this is a public affairs campaign, not a PR effort. There’s a difference. The goal was to mobilize allies around issues Wal-Mart cares about, not to generally improve public perception.

  • Visit the site they have built around this effort, Wal-Mart Facts. This site is issue oriented and not aimed at the general public. It is for journalists, policy makers, investors and, well, anyone really engaged in Wal-Mart and its issues.
  • The blogger relations effort is being run out of Edelman’s DC office and is headed by conservative bloggers with political backgrounds. Its leader, Mike Krempasky, was the man behind RatherGate and is one of the folks behind RedState. These are political/public affairs pros, not PR folks.
  • The blogger outreach focused on political bloggers. And if you read the correspondence between an Edelman executive and one of the bloggers, it is an ideological pitch that is being made. The language being spoken is one that people who have only done PR work may not be used to or comfortable with. This effort has more in common with a political campaign than an effort to pitch bloggers on products.

I’ve personally done more online public affairs work than PR work, and I judged the campaign based on the wrong criteria. I think others are making the same mistake - judging a public affairs campaign as if it were a PR effort. It may seem obvious, but I think its an important distinction to make.

Technorati Tags:

Trackbacks/Pings

Comments

  1. Vote -1 Vote +1Niall Cook - March 11th, 2006 at 5:00 am

    Spot on, Todd. Too many people are judging this campaign without appreciating this distinction.

  2. Vote -1 Vote +1Mike Krempasky - March 11th, 2006 at 1:13 pm

    Only one distinction - *was* the man behind Rathergate. Passed that site off last fall.

  3. Vote -1 Vote +1ToddZeigler - March 12th, 2006 at 11:01 am

    Mike - I edited the post. Niall - thanks for the comment.

About this blog

The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research and analysis on the web-based communications industry. TBR content is posted, created and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.



Email Subscription

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search Site



Most Popular


Authors


Tags