<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the Value of Newspaper Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-17499</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/#comment-17499</guid>
		<description>I am intrigued by newspaper blogs.  They certainly are an opportunity to engage readers -- particularly those under the age of 30 -- who are abandoning traditional newspapers for online sources and news parodies on Comedy Central.

On the other hand, I am concerned with the latitude that reporters have when blogging.  Blogging is about opinions and feelings, not hard facts.  Are reporters under the same professional standards when blogging?  Saying that something is &quot;unofficial&quot; doesn&#039;t negate its impact when it appears on a credible news site. What recourse do PR folks have when they don&#039;t like the opinion of an influential reporter who happens to blog?

In short, when it comes to blogging are we entering a journalistic/PR no man&#039;s land?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am intrigued by newspaper blogs.  They certainly are an opportunity to engage readers &#8212; particularly those under the age of 30 &#8212; who are abandoning traditional newspapers for online sources and news parodies on Comedy Central.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I am concerned with the latitude that reporters have when blogging.  Blogging is about opinions and feelings, not hard facts.  Are reporters under the same professional standards when blogging?  Saying that something is &#8220;unofficial&#8221; doesn&#8217;t negate its impact when it appears on a credible news site. What recourse do PR folks have when they don&#8217;t like the opinion of an influential reporter who happens to blog?</p>
<p>In short, when it comes to blogging are we entering a journalistic/PR no man&#8217;s land?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-313056</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/#comment-313056</guid>
		<description>I am intrigued by newspaper blogs.  They certainly are an opportunity to engage readers -- particularly those under the age of 30 -- who are abandoning traditional newspapers for online sources and news parodies on Comedy Central.

On the other hand, I am concerned with the latitude that reporters have when blogging.  Blogging is about opinions and feelings, not hard facts.  Are reporters under the same professional standards when blogging?  Saying that something is &quot;unofficial&quot; doesn&#039;t negate its impact when it appears on a credible news site. What recourse do PR folks have when they don&#039;t like the opinion of an influential reporter who happens to blog?

In short, when it comes to blogging are we entering a journalistic/PR no man&#039;s land?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am intrigued by newspaper blogs.  They certainly are an opportunity to engage readers &#8212; particularly those under the age of 30 &#8212; who are abandoning traditional newspapers for online sources and news parodies on Comedy Central.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I am concerned with the latitude that reporters have when blogging.  Blogging is about opinions and feelings, not hard facts.  Are reporters under the same professional standards when blogging?  Saying that something is &#8220;unofficial&#8221; doesn&#8217;t negate its impact when it appears on a credible news site. What recourse do PR folks have when they don&#8217;t like the opinion of an influential reporter who happens to blog?</p>
<p>In short, when it comes to blogging are we entering a journalistic/PR no man&#8217;s land?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strive Notes &#187; November 24th: this week&#8217;s top 5</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-16071</link>
		<dc:creator>Strive Notes &#187; November 24th: this week&#8217;s top 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2006/what-is-the-value-of-newspaper-blogs/#comment-16071</guid>
		<description>[...] 4. Todd Zeigler at The Bivings Report has a good analysis of the value of newspaper blogs and gives them some sound advice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4. Todd Zeigler at The Bivings Report has a good analysis of the value of newspaper blogs and gives them some sound advice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

