<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogBurst Wants to Give Us Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/</link>
	<description>The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research and analysis on the web-based communications industry. TBR content is posted, created and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:41:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/comment-page-1/#comment-40826</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/#comment-40826</guid>
		<description>I encourage you to look at the BlogBurst contributor agreement in its current state.  We changed it considerably in Q3 to remove a number of the onerous requirements after hearing feedback from a number of bloggers. You can read more about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogburst.com/blogger/agreement.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;

If you still feel there are issues, please let us know.  We are constantly re-evaluating the offering/agreements/etc to make this a successful service for our blogger and publisher partners
-Eric Newman, Pluck (BlogBurst)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage you to look at the BlogBurst contributor agreement in its current state.  We changed it considerably in Q3 to remove a number of the onerous requirements after hearing feedback from a number of bloggers. You can read more about it <a href="http://www.blogburst.com/blogger/agreement.html" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>If you still feel there are issues, please let us know.  We are constantly re-evaluating the offering/agreements/etc to make this a successful service for our blogger and publisher partners<br />
-Eric Newman, Pluck (BlogBurst)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micro Persuasion</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/comment-page-1/#comment-38723</link>
		<dc:creator>Micro Persuasion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/#comment-38723</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Double Standard on Compensation...&lt;/strong&gt;

Earlier this week I wrote about how ZDNet is compensating its bloggers based on traffic to their posts. What&#039;s unclear is how long they track the clicks. Even though a particular post may not get a lot of views immediately,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Double Standard on Compensation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Earlier this week I wrote about how ZDNet is compensating its bloggers based on traffic to their posts. What&#8217;s unclear is how long they track the clicks. Even though a particular post may not get a lot of views immediately,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/comment-page-1/#comment-37699</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/#comment-37699</guid>
		<description>Robin,

Great point.  I noticed how onerous their contract is when I signed up.  I will take a closer look at it.  For us though, the benefit of exposing more people to our content outweighs the copyright concerns.  Others will legitimately reach the conclusion to stay far away from BlogBurst given the issues you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>Great point.  I noticed how onerous their contract is when I signed up.  I will take a closer look at it.  For us though, the benefit of exposing more people to our content outweighs the copyright concerns.  Others will legitimately reach the conclusion to stay far away from BlogBurst given the issues you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hamman</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/comment-page-1/#comment-37290</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/blogburst-wants-to-give-us-money/#comment-37290</guid>
		<description>I was initially enthusiastic about blogburst myself but was set straight by a commenter who posted a link to this:

http://www.medgadget.com/archives/2006/05/beware_blogburs_1.html

Apparently, blogburst&#039;s terms and conditions amount to a rights grab - here&#039;s an excerpt from the blogburst terms and conditions, as quoted in the post I&#039;ve linked to above:

... you grant to Pluck and its affiliates a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual license to reproduce, distribute, make derivative works of, perform, display, disclose, and otherwise dispose of the Work (and derivative works thereof) for the purposes of (a) modifying the Work without substantially changing its original meaning, and (b) distributing the Work (and derivative works thereof) to Publisher electronic web sites or corresponding printed editions, whether now known or hereafter devised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was initially enthusiastic about blogburst myself but was set straight by a commenter who posted a link to this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medgadget.com/archives/2006/05/beware_blogburs_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.medgadget.com/archi.....urs_1.html</a></p>
<p>Apparently, blogburst&#8217;s terms and conditions amount to a rights grab &#8211; here&#8217;s an excerpt from the blogburst terms and conditions, as quoted in the post I&#8217;ve linked to above:</p>
<p>&#8230; you grant to Pluck and its affiliates a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual license to reproduce, distribute, make derivative works of, perform, display, disclose, and otherwise dispose of the Work (and derivative works thereof) for the purposes of (a) modifying the Work without substantially changing its original meaning, and (b) distributing the Work (and derivative works thereof) to Publisher electronic web sites or corresponding printed editions, whether now known or hereafter devised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
