Measuring Dell Hells July 17, 2007

Posted by Steve Petersen in Blogs, ImpactWatch, Monitoring, PR, Web 2.0

ImpactWatch is one of our main products. It is a PR measurement tool that our clients use for mainstream media coverage, but blogosphere measurement is harder to assess since readership and authority aren’t easily quantifiable.

Companies simply lack the resources to closely monitor all that is said about them, and blogs have expanded their radar screen. I don’t know if the blogosphere has increased the number of people who chit chat about a company with others, but it has created a forum in which many more voices are measurable.

However, not all voices are equal in their importance to a company. Concerning this fact, one of issues I’ve grappled with is how to weigh general influence and influence within a specific topic.

For instance, using Dell as an example, most of the A-list bloggers very rarely discuss the company and its products directly. Granted, top blogs like Engadget and Techcrunch should interest Dell since they focus on technology, but what about other blogs like Boing Boing and The Huffington Post?

I use Dell as an example since the company has had to deal with a top blog that doesn’t focus on its arena. Remember Dell Hell?

Although Jeff Jarvis and his BuzzMachine blog are prominent, they focus on media, not technology. Thus, they typically shouldn’t worry Dell, but when Jarvis blogged about his “Dell Hell,” the rules changed. In fact, sometimes when bloggers (especially an A-lister) complain about a company and its products, word can spread fast. Sometimes even the mainstream media picks up on such rants.

Measurement is tough in situations like Dell Hell. Does Dell need to devote resources to scrupulously follow BuzzMachine? No, since Jarvis mainly blogs about media and not computer hardware and software. However, Jarvis was worth Dell’s attention for a while.

How can a company determine which bloggers who don’t focus on the company and its field require their attention? Then, when should they start and stop monitoring such blogs?

Trackbacks/Pings

  1. Vote -1 Vote +1BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Measuring influence - July 17th, 2007 at 11:44 pm

  2. Vote -1 Vote +1Measuring Blog Relationships » The Bivings Report - July 18th, 2007 at 4:07 pm

  3. Vote -1 Vote +1links for 2007-07-18 - July 18th, 2007 at 6:33 pm

  4. Vote -1 Vote +1Measuring Dell Hells : Wonderful Thoughts - July 28th, 2007 at 7:22 am

Comments

  1. Vote -1 Vote +1Todd Zeigler - July 17th, 2007 at 4:10 pm

    In my opinion, there are two approaches:

    (1) You can track everything anyone says about you. This is probably preferred, but most companies aren’t going to have the bandwidth for this.

    (2) You can track the blogs in your sector that are well read (the influencers)and supplement it with coverage from aggregator sites like Digg, Techmeme, etc. Under this approach you’ll not get everything, but you’ll get the msot important stuff. And items like “Dell Hell” will inevitably appear on these other sites even if Buzz Machine isn’t on your tracking list.

  2. Vote -1 Vote +1JohnP@Dell - July 18th, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Monitoring can be a vexing proposition, for sure. But based on our experiences at Dell, and given the dynamics of democratization and aggregation in the blogosphere, companies that ignore the sub A-listers and bloggers outside of their sector do so at their own risk.

About this blog

The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research and analysis on the web-based communications industry. TBR content is posted, created and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.



Email Subscription

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search Site



Most Popular


Authors


Tags