<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fallacy of Using Inbound Links to Track Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/</link>
	<description>The Bivings Report (TBR) is a source of news, insight, research and analysis on the web-based communications industry. TBR content is posted, created and managed by internet strategists, media/communications analysts, web developers, designers and programmers, all of whom are employees of The Bivings Group.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:41:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-279865</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/#comment-279865</guid>
		<description>[...] discussing measurement, ROI and the overall success of a blog, Todd Zeigler provides his thoughts on the fallacies of using inbound links to track [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussing measurement, ROI and the overall success of a blog, Todd Zeigler provides his thoughts on the fallacies of using inbound links to track [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-01-21 &#171; David Black</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-279659</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-01-21 &#171; David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/#comment-279659</guid>
		<description>[...] The Fallacy of Using Inbound Links to Track Influence - The Bivings Report &#8220;In trying to measure blogs, a lot of people put a great deal of stock in inbound links. It might not be going too far to say that inbound links have become the standard by which the influence of a blog is measured.&#8221; (tags: internet blogging community audience) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Fallacy of Using Inbound Links to Track Influence &#8211; The Bivings Report &#8220;In trying to measure blogs, a lot of people put a great deal of stock in inbound links. It might not be going too far to say that inbound links have become the standard by which the influence of a blog is measured.&#8221; (tags: internet blogging community audience) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-279190</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-fallacy-of-using-inbound-links-to-track-influence/#comment-279190</guid>
		<description>Inbound links, as I understand it, are primarily for your PR, and yes, some traffic. My own impression of the traffic value of inbounds is similar to that of getting a good rating on Digg or Stumbleupon. You can get a brief spike in traffic, but all too often the &quot;sticky&quot; factor is absent. All our traffic building efforts, in my opinion, should be done with the end goal of building &quot;sticky&quot;, or repeat, traffic, ie: people that are actually interested in what you may write next.

Just my 2 cents,
Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inbound links, as I understand it, are primarily for your PR, and yes, some traffic. My own impression of the traffic value of inbounds is similar to that of getting a good rating on Digg or Stumbleupon. You can get a brief spike in traffic, but all too often the &#8220;sticky&#8221; factor is absent. All our traffic building efforts, in my opinion, should be done with the end goal of building &#8220;sticky&#8221;, or repeat, traffic, ie: people that are actually interested in what you may write next.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents,<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
