I spent some time today playing with Yammer, which allows organizations to essentially set up their own private micro-blogging community limited to their employees. Put more simply, it allows a company like us (The Bivings Group) to set up our own private Twitter.
Yammer works great!
There is a lot to like here from a technical perspective:
- Sign up is simple. You join simply by signing up with your organizational email address and you automatically join the network.
- The user interface is great. The design is very similar to Twitter, so it is very easy to use and familiar.
- It has a great Adobe Air client. You can use Yammer via a slick desktop program that is reminiscent of Twhirl, which is a compliment.
- There are some great additional features you won’t find on Twitter. Yammer includes the ability to create and subscribe to groups, upload files as part of your updates and view an organizational chart of your company the system creates for you.
This is a nicely made web application.
What’s the point?
After playing with Yammer for a while and inviting some of my colleagues to join me, I’m left struggling to come up with a reason that a company would need a private micro-blogging network. We certainly don’t at Bivings. I have millions of ways to communicate with my colleagues already. I can get project updates from Basecamp, chat on Instant Messenger, send individual or group emails using old fashioned Microsoft Outlook, keep tabs on folks via social networks like Twitter and Facebook, or god forbid, simply walk across the room and talk to folks.
I don’t have the problem Yammer solves. I don’t imagine many others do either.
Confusing to employees?
Jason Fried from 37 Signals wrote a few great posts last week about how Get Satisfaction’s set up sort of passively forces companies to use their service. Yammer has a similar problem.
I was the first person to sign up for the service from an @bivings.com email address. By doing this, I automatically created a network for The Bivings Group without really being aware of it. After joining, I am encouraged to invite colleagues to join me on Yammer as a way of spreading the word, and they are encouraged to do the same after they sign up. With the big “Bivings” branding at the top of the page and a bunch of work colleagues participating, this thing pretty quickly starts to look like a company-sponsored site even though its not. This could lead to confusion for employees at larger companies.
If, as a company representative, you want to take control of your Yammer network to clear up this confusion and exert some administrative control, you have to claim the network on the Yammer enterprise services page. There is a free version of Yammer for enterprises, but to sign up you have to enter your credit card, and a lot of the functionality you’d want as a company administrator is only available if you pay Yammer’s per user fees. For its silver and gold versions Yammer charges $1 and $5 respectively per user, which means the service gets expensive pretty quickly. At 30 people, it would cost The Bivings Group $150 per month for the entire firm to use the product.
Perhaps more importantly, I do not see any way for a company to opt out of Yammer completely should they not want their employees to use the tool. So the only way for a company to really exert control is to sign up for either a free or paid Yammer account for their domain and start monitoring it.
I would be fine if Yammer were either 100% unofficial or 100% official. Trying to have it both ways seems sketchy to me though. This middle ground can lead to confusion among employees and/or kind of coerce companies into using it.
I think Get Satisfaction is a little sketchy in the same way, as it is trying to have it both ways too with its official/unofficial customer services pages.
What do you think?