Jun 8, 2009

I participated in a panel discussion put on by NextGenWeb last week on building communities online. Over the course of the discussion, I mentioned that on the sites I manage Twitter generally drives more traffic than Facebook. Adam Conner from Facebook was also on the panel, and quickly rattled off a few sites for which Facebook is a significant traffic referrer as a way of countering my argument.

The fact that Twitter drives traffic is not news, but I figured I would do some quick research and share my experience as to how Twitter and Facebook compare as traffic drivers. I looked at the May statistics for five sites Bivings’ manages that maintain active presences on both Facebook and Twitter. On Facebook, in all cases the organization’s primary presence on Facebook was a Fan Page. Here is what I found:

On average, Twitter was the fourth biggest referrer for the sites. It ranged from the third to fifth most popular referrer.
On average, Facebook was the tenth biggest referrer for the sites. It ranged from sixth to fifteenth most popular referrer.
Twitter drove more traffic than Facebook on all the sites I looked at, despite the fact that on two of the sites the number of Facebook fans was far greater than the number of Twitter followers (a ratio of three to one).
Overall, Twitter was responsible for driving two times more traffic than Facebook.

Note that these stats probably underestimate the traffic driven by Twitter, as it doesn’t take into account traffic coming from third party tools like Twhirl and Tweetdeck.

Obviously, this is not a scientific study and the results are anecdotal. Things may also change quickly. But I’m not going to let that stop me from speculating as to why Twitter is driving more traffic on the sites we manage.

Twitter is all about links. Facebook, less so. While my personal Facebook stream is slowly being taken over by people cross publishing their Twitter feeds, the status updates of my friends on Facebook typically don’t include links. And if they do, I typically don’t click on them. On Facebook, I’m much more interested in looking at pictures and engaging in discussions with people than clicking on links to third party sites. Finding and clicking on links is the thing I do most on Twitter.

The level of engagement people have with the pages they are fans of on Facebook is pretty low. Facebook redesigned their pages feature a few months back, and the change definitely made pages more valuable by inserting page updates into users Facebook news feed. But I think users still tend to tune these updates out, and are also pretty good at ignoring the mass messages page administrators can send out through Facebook.

Indeed, last night Patrick Ruffini tweeted that for the projects he is working on he is seeing three times better results from regular Facebook profile pages as compared to fan pages. I’ve seen similar results. Despite Facebook attempts to blur the distinction between pages and profiles, I think users can tell the difference and are much more engaged with their friends on the network than the brands they are fans of.

Ultimately, I think Facebook is still primarily about your friends, while Twitter is more about content discovery (and, increasingly, brands and celebrities). I have no doubt this will change as Facebook continues to grow and tweaks its model further. But for now the nature of Twitter makes it a better driver of traffic than Facebook, at least in my experience.

What has your experience been?

http://www.seaviewwa.com Nansen

I completely agree with your conclusions. Twitter is a dynamic, content sharing medium. It has a broader reach that allows me to communicate with those I may not want to be so ‘intimate…as a facebook friend’. Twitter allows me to pop in and out…and it takes less time for me to ‘engage’ – while facebook can be a hassle as I go about my daily tasks. Nothing beats the dm method of urgent and brief communication either.
@nansen
http://www.seaviewwa.com Nansen

I completely agree with your conclusions. Twitter is a dynamic, content sharing medium. It has a broader reach that allows me to communicate with those I may not want to be so ‘intimate…as a facebook friend’. Twitter allows me to pop in and out…and it takes less time for me to ‘engage’ – while facebook can be a hassle as I go about my daily tasks. Nothing beats the dm method of urgent and brief communication either.
@nansen
http://www.edwalker.net/blog Ed Walker

I’ve found that they serve different functions for different sites that I work with:

- For the Students’ Union site then Facebook is a bigger traffic driver than Twitter. This is because our main target audience, UK students 18-25 are big Facebook users and by posting links/photos/videos from fan page it generates good traffic. They don’t seem to have taken to Twitter as much yet, we have a small following on there but the base of student population isn’t there yet.

- For the local community blog that I run then it’s the other way round. I only have a Twitter presence and it’s been brilliant at growing traffic to the site, it’s constantly battling with Google as the top referrer (although as more legacy content is created, Google is sneaking ahead). I don’t have a Facebook presence for the blog, as I don’t think it’s the right place for it.
http://www.edwalker.net/blog Ed Walker

I’ve found that they serve different functions for different sites that I work with:

- For the Students’ Union site then Facebook is a bigger traffic driver than Twitter. This is because our main target audience, UK students 18-25 are big Facebook users and by posting links/photos/videos from fan page it generates good traffic. They don’t seem to have taken to Twitter as much yet, we have a small following on there but the base of student population isn’t there yet.

- For the local community blog that I run then it’s the other way round. I only have a Twitter presence and it’s been brilliant at growing traffic to the site, it’s constantly battling with Google as the top referrer (although as more legacy content is created, Google is sneaking ahead). I don’t have a Facebook presence for the blog, as I don’t think it’s the right place for it.
http://www.chrisnorton.biz Chris Norton

I have to agree with you Todd. Doesn’t the saying go: “Facebook is for friends and people you don’t really talk to anymore and Twitter is for people you don’t know but you want to get to know.”

In my experience Facebook pages are OK for established brands and companies whereas Twitter is good for businesses or indivduals looking to connect to others. After all virtual/social networking is just like the real thing but without the face to face interaction.
http://www.chrisnorton.biz Chris Norton

I have to agree with you Todd. Doesn’t the saying go: “Facebook is for friends and people you don’t really talk to anymore and Twitter is for people you don’t know but you want to get to know.”

In my experience Facebook pages are OK for established brands and companies whereas Twitter is good for businesses or indivduals looking to connect to others. After all virtual/social networking is just like the real thing but without the face to face interaction.
http://www.chargewealth.com/?p=103 What You Need To Do Before Submitting Your Plr Articles | Chargewealth.com provide you the all the internet marketing news and knowledge.

[...] Does Facebook Drive as much Traffic as Twitter? [...]
http://www.thewomensfoundation.org Lisa Kays

Hey Todd,

I totally agree with you as well, and our stats support it (as you may know). We just started Twittering (Tweeting?) recently, and it’s definitely showing up in our stats as an important traffic driver. Facebook, too, but not quite as much and my guess is that over time as we Tweet more, that gap will widen even more.

Lisa
http://www.thewomensfoundation.org Lisa Kays

Hey Todd,

I totally agree with you as well, and our stats support it (as you may know). We just started Twittering (Tweeting?) recently, and it’s definitely showing up in our stats as an important traffic driver. Facebook, too, but not quite as much and my guess is that over time as we Tweet more, that gap will widen even more.

Lisa
http://fudder.de kus

an analysis from a german wenbsite:

How important is social distribution?

http://www.axel-springer-akade.....eichweite/
http://fudder.de kus

an analysis from a german wenbsite:

How important is social distribution?

http://www.axel-springer-akade.....eichweite/
http://www.bivingsreport.com/2009/the-twitterfacebook-traffic-referral-explosion/ The Twitter+Facebook Traffic Referral Explosion

[...] wrote a post a few weeks back that looked at how Facebook and Twitter compare as traffic drivers. What I didn’t mention in my [...]
http://www.articlesbook.com Kamlesh

I think I think twitter gives more quality traffic than facebook.
http://www.articlesbook.com Kamlesh

I think I think twitter gives more quality traffic than facebook.
http://www.articlesbook.com Kamlesh

I think twitter gives more quality traffic than facebook.
http://www.articlesbook.com Kamlesh

I think twitter gives more quality traffic than facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504755033 Kusnadhi Yasa

Facebook is like a serious friend networking and twitter is like fun for discovering topic, but the quality and credibility referer come from facebook. If you want to find high target visitor focus on facebook.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Notice

We are pleased to announce the launch of the Brick Factory, a Washington, DC-based digital agency founded by former employees of The Bivings Group. You can read the details of the transition here.

As a result of the change, The Bivings Report will no longer be updated, although we intend to keep it up for archival purposes. You can read the Brick Factory's new blog here.

Does Facebook Drive as much Traffic as Twitter?

Notice

Categories

Archives